Legislature(1997 - 1998)
05/07/1998 04:10 PM Senate JUD
Audio | Topic |
---|
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
CSHB 203(JUD) - ACTIONS FOR UNLAWFUL TRADE PRACTICES CHAIRMAN ROBIN TAYLOR called the Judiciary Committee meeting to order at approximately 4:10 p.m. and announced CSHB 203(JUD) to be up for consideration. REPRESENTATIVE DYSON said only two part-time people work in the Consumer Protection Division of the Attorney General's Office. This bill is an effort to privatize some portions of that office to allow consumers to protect themselves from fraud. HB 203 removes the $200 limit that made it virtually impractical to get legal assistance when going after an alledged perpetrator when one is a victim of fraud. It allows for the recovery of damages, reasonable costs, and some punitive damage. It also allows for injunctive relief, if there is a conviction, if the magistrate agrees. HB 203 also allows a person who is not a party to the fraud to seek the injunctive relief. REPRESENTATIVE DYSON added that frivolous lawsuits are dealt with too. REPRESENTATIVE DYSON said the Alaska State Chamber of Commerce does not oppose this. SENATOR ELLIS said he supported the bill as he represents a lot of senior citizens who have been victimized. REPRESENTATIVE DYSON said he wanted to put together a task force to act as a clearinghouse to help people get this kind of protection. Number 140 CHAIRMAN TAYLOR asked if the punitive damage section was different from last year's tort reform bill. REPRESENTATIVE DYSON said he thought it was identical. CHAIRMAN TAYLOR replied he thought it was different. SENATOR PARNELL asked CHAIRMAN TAYLOR if he wanted the language to mirror the past tort reform legislation. CHAIRMAN TAYLOR answered yes. REPRESENTATIVE DYSON said punitive damages would be awarded in addition to the actual damages going to the victim. The intention is to discourage people from looking for lawsuits to file. SENATOR PARNELL questioned why language was needed on page 2, lines 10-13, saying the Commissioner of Administration should simply account for that money. REPRESENTATIVE DYSON said that was put in by the House Judiciary Committee and it mirrored tort reform language that passed. CHAIRMAN TAYLOR noted that this bill was not limited to telemarketing frauds. Number 261 MR. DAVEED SCHWARTZ, Department of Law (DOL), said DOL supports HB 203 because it enhances a private litigant's ability to enforce consumer rights. He said encouraging private enforcement of consumer protection matters is particularly important at a time when State resources devoted to consumer protection are significantly less than in years passed. CHAIRMAN TAYLOR asked him if three times actual damages was per act or per cause. MR. SCHWARTZ replied that the language referred to each unlawful act. CHAIRMAN TAYLOR said it looks like this provision has to do with class actions and that one would literally be allowed to get three times the actual damages for each act. MR. SCHWARTZ responded there hasn't been a lot of litigation under 531(A) and that section is not limited to class actions. It could be an individual's action. CHAIRMAN TAYLOR noted that is current law. MR. SCHWARTZ said the willfulness requirement would be eliminated under the proposed change. Number 336 MS. PEGGY MULLIGAN, Capital City Task Force, AARP, noted the committee already received its position paper in support of HB 203 which goes a long way in helping Alaskans to fight fraud. HB 203 may also act as a deterrent to unlawful practices because it allows people to take these cases to court. MS. MARIE DARLIN, NARFP, supported Ms. Mulligan's comments regarding HB 203. Number 367 SENATOR PARNELL moved to delete the section on page 2, lines 10-13, that requires the Commissioner of Administration to separately account for the money and for the Legislature to direct the money. There were no objections therefore Amendment #1 passed. SENATOR PARNELL said Section 45.50.531 (Rule 82) might be taking a step backward in terms of awarding fees and costs compared to current law. MS. PAM LABOLLE, Alaska State Chamber of Commerce, said it had a problem in House Judiciary because Rule 82 was not applicable. The prevailing plaintiff gets attorney fees, the prevailing defendant must pay his/her own. The inclusion of Rule 82 was an attempt to fix that but it's possible that it doesn't totally fix the problem. Number 441 REPRESENTATIVE DYSON said that provision was and attempt to help the "little guy" who was going up against multiple attorneys on retainer and was afraid he would lose and have to pay court costs. CHAIRMAN TAYLOR said he thought the attorney fee section was a direct modification of Rule 82. MS. LABOLLE explained the Chamber's intent was to protect mom and pop organizations. SENATOR PARNELL said he thought it was a step backwards, because the court may award the prevailing party all or a portion of the fees. Number 528 SENATOR PARNELL moved to pass CSHB 203(JUD) from committee with individual recommendations. There were no objections and it was so ordered.
Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
---|